This is when a small parcel of land is granted different zoning than the parcels that surround it.
By its very nature, the zoning map is intended to be painted with a broad brush. Unchecked, the pointillism of spot zoning will gradually overpaint the map until there are no zones, only parcels.
I have looked at countless proposals for zoning changes and have come to the conclusion that there are only five good reasons to grant such a change
#1, The original zoning is a mistake.
Someone may have made an error, or the zoning is the result of previous spot zoning, or it reflects some use (like night offal removal) that is no longer feasible.
#2, There is a genuine hardship.
A hardship is when you cannot build the size building your zoning’s FAR allows on your size lot. Everyone claims to have a hardship. A small lot is not a hardship, a triangular lot is not necessarily a hardship, and having paid too much for your lot is not a hardship.
#3, The change is needed to create a transition zone between districts with widely differing bulk, density or use standards.
#4, The proposed project or use is highly beneficial to the community and a change is needed to achieve this.
#5, The project is in a blighted area, and the developer deserves a cookie for having the stones to build there.
You will notice that the phrase “To make more money”, is nowhere on this list
Paul K. Dickman
Saturday, September 26, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment