'I was gonna leave it alone after putting up the 1976 crime stats in We're havin' a crime wave.
But a couple of barflies got into it on Milwaukee Avenue and one of 'em got stuck. Now everyone is moaning about how Wicker Park used to be a safe neighborhood and upticks in crime.
Wicker Park was never a safe neighborhood. No neighborhood in the city is. (except perhaps Edison Park)
Wicker Park is the safest it's been in over 40 years.
Here are the index crime stats for the 14th district.
I feel sorry for cops at Caps meetings. They sit there while people rant and rave, but I know that the only thought going through he cops heads is,
"Jeez, white people's problems"
That's not to say everything is rosy. We do have a crime wave of sorts.
30% of all our index crime consists of someone getting shit stolen out of their car.
Wanna take a bite out of crime? Never leave anything more valuable than an empty cheeseburger wrapper in your car.
Paul K. Dickman
Friday, June 17, 2016
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
We're havin' a crime wave
Back in the late 70s, some sociologists at Northwestern got a Dept of Justice grant for something called the "Reactions to crime project". They went to urban neighborhoods and interviewed the locals about local crime and compared this information to the actual local crime statistics. One of the Chicago neighborhoods was Wicker Park (along with Lincoln Park, Woodlawn and Back of the Yards.)
Today I want to highlight this:
This is the annual crime count for 1976 crimes in Wicker Park. (Augusta to Armitage, Western to Ashland)
Look at those counts. They were 6-10 times higher than they are currently. They're higher than the entirety of West Town. In fact I would put them up against any similar sized area in the roughest parts of Englewood or Austin and make those neighborhoods look like Mayberry.
In any event the original studies can be found here:
http://skogan.org/files/Lewis_and_Maxfield.Fear_in_the_Neighborhoods_An_Investigation_of_the_Impact_of_Crime.1980.pdf
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/85917.pdf
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/85506.pdf
They're required reading for any student of Wicker Park history.Particularly the second "The methodological overview" it contains some great contemporary accounts of what the neighborhood was like when it started to gentrify.
Paul K. Dickman
Today I want to highlight this:
This is the annual crime count for 1976 crimes in Wicker Park. (Augusta to Armitage, Western to Ashland)
Look at those counts. They were 6-10 times higher than they are currently. They're higher than the entirety of West Town. In fact I would put them up against any similar sized area in the roughest parts of Englewood or Austin and make those neighborhoods look like Mayberry.
In any event the original studies can be found here:
http://skogan.org/files/Lewis_and_Maxfield.Fear_in_the_Neighborhoods_An_Investigation_of_the_Impact_of_Crime.1980.pdf
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/85917.pdf
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/85506.pdf
They're required reading for any student of Wicker Park history.Particularly the second "The methodological overview" it contains some great contemporary accounts of what the neighborhood was like when it started to gentrify.
Paul K. Dickman
Saturday, April 30, 2016
Men Are Like Streetcars
You've all heard the old saw,
Men are like streetcars, another one will be along any minute.
I never gave it much thought until I ran across this while researching urban renewal efforts in the Wicker Park area. It's a report of transit service from 1951's "A plan to guide redevelopment in the northwest central area of Chicago" by the Plan Commission and is courtesy of the Hathi Trust digital library.
Take a look at the Milwaukee Streetcar. In each direction it ran, on average. every 2 1/2 minutes and every 58 seconds during rush hours.
Imagine the convenience of stepping out on the street and having transit show up in the time it takes you to get the change out of your pocket.
Imagine a transfer. How much time do you add to your schedule when ever you have to change buses?
When the CTA took over the transit system, they ushered in an era of efficiency. Don't get me wrong, at the time it was what saved mass transportation in Chicago. But the philosophy of maximizing each bus load a the expense of customer convenience is still in effect to this day.
If you want more people to chose transit over their own auto, you have to make it so convenient that driving is a waste of time.
It doesn't do much good to shave 8 minutes off a 16 mile bus ride if I have to waste half an hour waiting for a bus.
Paul K. Dickman
Men are like streetcars, another one will be along any minute.
I never gave it much thought until I ran across this while researching urban renewal efforts in the Wicker Park area. It's a report of transit service from 1951's "A plan to guide redevelopment in the northwest central area of Chicago" by the Plan Commission and is courtesy of the Hathi Trust digital library.
Take a look at the Milwaukee Streetcar. In each direction it ran, on average. every 2 1/2 minutes and every 58 seconds during rush hours.
Imagine the convenience of stepping out on the street and having transit show up in the time it takes you to get the change out of your pocket.
Imagine a transfer. How much time do you add to your schedule when ever you have to change buses?
When the CTA took over the transit system, they ushered in an era of efficiency. Don't get me wrong, at the time it was what saved mass transportation in Chicago. But the philosophy of maximizing each bus load a the expense of customer convenience is still in effect to this day.
If you want more people to chose transit over their own auto, you have to make it so convenient that driving is a waste of time.
It doesn't do much good to shave 8 minutes off a 16 mile bus ride if I have to waste half an hour waiting for a bus.
Paul K. Dickman
Monday, December 14, 2015
They won't let their beloved neighborhood become another Wicker Park,
A recent article about anti-gentrification forces in Pilsen contained the this statement.
As a Wicker Parker, I freely admit that we chose the path of gentrification, but I am tired of being the poster child for a narrative about people being displaced by Yuppies and Hipsters.
This narrative is usually accompanied by a graph like this.
It seem to show that Hispanics, after being displaced from Lincoln Park in the 60s, migrated to Wicker Park. Which grew to a predominantly Latino neighborhood, only to have them displaced again by Yuppies in the 90s.
Technically it is true (except for the part about growing) but it doesn't tell the whole story.
I have spent a lot of time pouring over census records of the 8 tracts that make up Wicker Park and here's a chart of its Hispanic population count.
You'll notice that the numbers jump in 1970 and have declined ever since.
There is no precipitous drop in the 90s. In fact the decline is so close to a straight line that no evidence of any period of displacement can be found.
Back then, Wicker Park was a slum. It was that way already in the 1960s and it was apparent to the incoming Hispanic population. No sooner did they get here, than they started to leave.
Here's a chart comparing the change in each group's populations between each census.
The period of Hispanic dominance of the population came not from the growth of that group, they were actually declining in numbers. Instead it came from the fact that everyone else was leaving faster.
That ratio switched in the 1980s.
Paul K. Dickman
As a Wicker Parker, I freely admit that we chose the path of gentrification, but I am tired of being the poster child for a narrative about people being displaced by Yuppies and Hipsters.
This narrative is usually accompanied by a graph like this.
It seem to show that Hispanics, after being displaced from Lincoln Park in the 60s, migrated to Wicker Park. Which grew to a predominantly Latino neighborhood, only to have them displaced again by Yuppies in the 90s.
Technically it is true (except for the part about growing) but it doesn't tell the whole story.
I have spent a lot of time pouring over census records of the 8 tracts that make up Wicker Park and here's a chart of its Hispanic population count.
You'll notice that the numbers jump in 1970 and have declined ever since.
There is no precipitous drop in the 90s. In fact the decline is so close to a straight line that no evidence of any period of displacement can be found.
Back then, Wicker Park was a slum. It was that way already in the 1960s and it was apparent to the incoming Hispanic population. No sooner did they get here, than they started to leave.
Here's a chart comparing the change in each group's populations between each census.
The period of Hispanic dominance of the population came not from the growth of that group, they were actually declining in numbers. Instead it came from the fact that everyone else was leaving faster.
That ratio switched in the 1980s.
Paul K. Dickman
Tuesday, September 8, 2015
Make no little plans 6, Unintended consequences
Two flats
A curious thing about the 1957 zoning code is that it pretty
much made it impossible to build a two flat on a standard city lot. I have
always wondered about it. I’ve never heard anyone complain about them. The
previous code had duplex districts where such things were a matter of right.
The 57 map replaced them with R3 districts. But the text precluded
putting a two dwelling structure on one lot in those districts.
The standard city lot is 25x 125 to 25x150 or 3125 to 3500
square feet.
The Code controlled density by limiting the number of
dwelling units by the square footage of the lot.
In the case of R3 it was 2200 sq ft of lot area per dwelling
unit. As you can see, in order to build a two flat you would have to combine
two standard lots. Why would you bother? Why not just build two single family
homes?
The new code also defined the minimum lot size for each
district. I have always wondered about this as well, I mean the city was 95%
subdivided by 1957. Why would anyone think it was an issue?
As I researched these articles, I could find no enmity to
this humble dwelling. In fact I found quite the opposite. The Master plan of
residential land use of Chicago clearly stated that they expected 25%-35% of the city’s population to reside in “Two
family dwellings”.
Why were these excluded from the 1957 code? Was this just
some typo that followed us to this day?
Then I read “Building new Neighborhoods; subdivision design
and standards, 1943”.
And it became clear.
They intended to change the size of the
standard city lot.
Actually, they hoped to re-plat the bulk of the city
In their opinion 25 ft lots were too narrow, 35 ft was
marginal, 40-50 ft was preferred.
A 35x150 lot has 5250 sqft more than enough for two
dwellings.
“How’s that supposed to work.? Wouldn’t a 35ft lot line be
in the middle of someone else’s house?” you might ask.
Not if you tear them all down.
They write:
“REDEVELOPMENT OF OLD CHICAGO
The recommendations contained herein
pertaining to subdivision design and standards would apply not only to the land
now vacant but to the redevelopment of the 23 square miles of blighted and
near-blighted properties which must be rebuilt within the next generation. Thus
more than 41 square miles of land in the city would benefit from improved
standards of design and from practical specifications for residential land
improvements. Within these 41 square miles over 300,000 families could find new
home sites located in well-designed, attractive neighborhoods of good character
and environment.”
Still, that’s only 20% of the city.
In the Master Plan they defined the areas of the city as:
14.60% Blighted & Near blighted
36.31% Conservation
23.34% Stable
the remainder was either vacant or under going some kind of
development
You can see them in this map.
Notice that the only areas they have marked as “Stable” are
out in the “Bungalow Belt” where the lots are already wide.
They figured that by the time they dealt with the blight,
the “Conservation” areas would now be blighted, either through decay or by
contrast with the “Rebuilt” areas. And then they would redevelop those.
Here’s another map of future development areas.
Notice that the areas formerly tagged as “Conservation” are
now labeled “Ripe for rebuilding”
And the former “Stable” areas, now they’re tagged as “Conservation”.
Since the
future solvency and livability of our great cities depend upon removing the
cancerous blighted areas that are sapping their vitality and upon building new
model communities on the cleared sites, every device, legal and financial,
should be employed to make it economically feasible for the blighted areas to
be rebuilt by private enterprise.
The scope of this is staggering. They fully intended that
the normal process of future development, would involve taking property through
eminent domain, clearing it at government expense and redistributing it to some
connected developer who build only what the Plan Commission liked.
Luckily, this did not come to pass, but as casualty of
battle, the two flat was lost.
It needn’t be permanent though. You need only change one
character of the current zoning code to make these “as of right” in RS3 districts.
Change the Minimum Lot Area per Unit Standard for RS3 from 2500 to
1500.
This would double
the population density potential of about half the city and hopefully spur
development out in the neighborhoods where it’s needed.
Paul K. Dickman
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/09/make-no-small-plans-5-we-dont-want.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-4-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-3-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-2-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/07/make-no-little-plans.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/09/make-no-small-plans-5-we-dont-want.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-4-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-3-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-2-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/07/make-no-little-plans.html
These maps are courtesy of the Hathitrust Digital library, they were digitized by Google from originals in the
University of Michigan collectionSunday, September 6, 2015
Make no little plans 5, We don't want nobody nobody sent
Wicker Park’s
first renewal project would also be part of its last, although the two would be
separated by almost 30 years. In ‘55 and ‘56 they demolished a couple of dozen
homes on Mautene and Bauwans (two streets now almost completely lost to
history) to make way for some parking lots where they planned to put the
new shopping center.
This was noticed by some in the community and in’56 the East
Humboldt Park Planning and Conservation Commission was formed with the intent
of getting the area designated as a “Conservation District” The Illinois Urban
Community Conservation Act of 1953 and it’s clone, the Federal Housing Act of
1954 created these districts to allow urban renewal in areas not yet classified
as slums. It freed up federal money for land acquisition as well as for repairs
to existing structures. For the city however, it would have one fatal flaw, it
required community input.
The East Humboldt commission was headed by Valentine Janicki,
a local business leader, owner of the United Novelty Mfg Co. and future
president of the Polish Alma Mater Association. He was not without his own
agenda. He had his eye on 9 sq blocks of land his commission felt need to be
cleared. He also had political aspirations, after this he would parlay his
Polish and political connections into a seat on the sanitary district, where
like all good Chicago politicos he would eventually be jailed in a sludge
hauling kickback scheme.
In ’57 Mayor Richard J. Daley, conscious of the Polish vote
appointed him to the Community Conservation Board, the group that selected
which parts of the city would become conservation areas and in ’58 East
Humboldt Park, an area bounded by Grand, Fullerton, California, and the river
(later the expressway) would gain that distinction.
Without Janicki at the helm, the East Humboldt commission
drifted into obscurity. This was probably a good thing. The Community
Conservation Act was literally designed to be co-opted by private enterprise.
It was created to allow the University
of Chicago turn Hyde Park
into their personal compound and later was used by the Southtown Planning
Association in their goal of stemming black migration in Englewood.
The city started making a conservation plan but was playing
it close to the vest. Its next two clearance projects were several houses on
Damen for rebuilding the Wicker Park
School (now Pritzker) in 1960,
And a large parcel just to the north of this for the CHA
elderly high rise project at Damen and Schiller in 62 -63
These, and announcement of several clearance projects,
including the one in what we now call Noble Square, would be a wake up call.
Several church leaders, fearing the dispersal of their flock in 1962 formed the
Northwest Community Organization (NCO), a supergroup of smaller community
organizations and a member of Saul Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation. The
local community group at the time, The Wicker Park Neighborhood Council aligned
themselves with the NCO.
The NCO managed to get several sympathetic people appointed
to the East Humboldt Park/Near Northwest
conservation area’s Conservation Community Council (CCC), a Mayorally selected body of
local citizens with oversight and veto power over the plans and recommendations
of the Dept of Urban Renewal for each conservation area. Together they would
battle the city to a halt at every turn.
In ’67 they battled the plans for the Tuley High (now
DeDiego) expansion. Although they wanted its expansion, the Board of Ed and the
DUR wanted it to go east across Clairmont to Oakley in the land they
preemptively downzoned for a park. The NCO felt the properties to the west were
in much worse condition and better candidates for demolition.
In ’68 the NCO would convince the Board of Ed to build a new
high school inside Humboldt Park,
but that would backfire. They would have to swap land to the park department.
You guessed it, the land they wanted to swap was the same blocks, Oakley to
Leavitt, Potomac to Hirsch they had downzoned. So the
NCO fought that too. In the end the city built Clemente on the site of an old
street car barn.
In ’69 the city produced its conservation plan for the area,
a vague document with large areas slated for demolition and the NCO went
apesh!t. They wrote their own plan. the “People’s Plan” It called for only spot
removal of dilapidated buildings, no new construction over 3 stories and, the
dealbreaker, 90% of all new construction to be affordable housing.
Through their seats on the CCC they vetoed any plan that
didn’t conform to theirs.
Daley, tired of this stalemate, tried to break their power
by appointing five of his own people to the CCC in place of theirs, and the NCO
took him to court. They won and the city pretty much threw up its hands.
1973’s Chicago 21 plan did not
include anything west of Ashland.
Despite this victory NCO would play a roll in the extensive
loss of Wicker Park’s
housing. Between 1970 and 1980 we would lose 22% of all our housing units. But
few would be at the hands of the city, most were due to arson.
Two initiatives combined in ways no one could foresee.
The NCO used the Department of Buildings to put a lot of
pressure on absentee landlords, calling in inspections constantly, in some
cases forcing demolition but mostly to force landlords to repair them.
Most of Wicker Park
was redlined by the banks until the early 80s, mortgages and home improvement
loans were simply unavailable. But what most people don’t realize is that we
were redlined by insurance companies as well.
The NCO struggled to end the redlining. They had
succeeded to get the FHA to back some mortgages, but the FHA was only
interested in single family properties. They also lobbied for a high risk
insurance pool. After the King riots, they got their wish. The Fair Plan
Insurance Act made it possible for anyone to get affordable fire insurance.
Faced with a low rent property, more valuable as a vacant
lot, with the city saying, repair it or they would condemn and take it,
the availability of fire insurance led to the biggest epidemic of landlord
lightning in the city’s history.
Evergreen between Leavitt and Hoyne lost 2/3 of its
buildings and looked like a war zone.
Although the pressure from the DUR was off, Wicker
Park was still in trouble.
Housing losses continued. Between 1970 and 1980 we lost 35%
of our population and the neighborhood became a house divided. Gang struggles, ethnic tensions,
all played a role, but for our story the biggest divide was between those who
thought that rising property values were a bad thing and those who thought it
was good.
Those people, labeled gentrifiers (probably rightly) had an
idea, landmarking. It could stem the housing loss and get federal grants (in
the early years) for repairs. They formed the Old Wicker Park Committee to
lobby for this designation. In 1979 they
succeeded in getting it much of it designated a National Historic Landmark
District and set about to actively promote the neighborhood.
But battle lines were drawn in the neighborhood, one group
protested affordable housing developments, one protested market rate housing
developments. One took realtors to court for putting up “For Sale” signs, the
other sued over design issues of affordable housing projects. Neither group
could see the goals they had in common and neither could claim this as their
finest hour.
The city still had some plans up their sleeve. Determined to
get one of their plans realized, in September of 1977, Richard W. Albrecht, the
city's deputy project planning coordinator, and Robert Littlebridge, director
of economic planning for the city's department of planning, under Bilandic,
visited Sievert Electric company on Ashland and told them not to go ahead with
any expansion because the city had an interest in the area.
In October of ’79 the next mayor, Jane Byrne, announced
their plan for the “West Town
Shopping Center”. At first it
seemed to only involve the vacant Weiboldt’s building, but less than a month
later it became clear that the project involved the clearance of nearly 60
buildings.
The first developer for the project backed out when $7
million in federal loan guarantees were denied. Perhaps it was just Reagan era
austerity, but a Jan 20, 1981
memo from the U.S. Dept of Commerce said “The projected retail sales from the
applicant’s project would overwhelmingly come from the current business of
existing competitors. This project will have an adverse impact on existing
retail and office space sales”
But this didn’t stop the project. Joseph Freed stepped in
and took it over.
At the cost of approx $.25 million in 1955 dollars for the
parking lots and $3.73 million in 1980s community block grant dollars, the city
acquired and cleared the land and sold it to Freed for $635,000. Then they got him
property tax incentives worth an additional $4.9 million.
The NCO would wage a valiant effort but they would lose. It
would be their last hurrah. They continued on fighting smaller fights until
1993, when the would close up shop. Although their financial arm, the
Bickerdike Redevelopment Corp would continue to this day.
The U.S Dept of Commerce’s memo would be prophetic. Unless
you include the time when it was filled with government offices, I don’t think
the shopping center ever replaced the 275 jobs it displaced and I doubt that it
ever paid as much in taxes as the businesses and residents on the 120 parcels
it contained would have. While the rest of Wicker
Park’s shopping areas blossomed,
the south end of Milwaukee Ave
languished.
In the end, the gentrifiers would prove to be right. The
housing losses declined through the 80s and turned positive in the next decade
at a rate nearly 20 times the city average. We have put back all the housing we
had in 1970 and after 25 straight years of population growth (25% since 1990 vs
City pop -2%) we’ve put back all the people we had in 1980.
According to the 2013 estimates, the current population density
is around 25,000 ppm.
If our household size matched the city average, we’d
be in the mid 30s, right where they wanted us at the start.
Paul K. Dickman
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-4-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-3-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-2-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/07/make-no-little-plans.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-4-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-3-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-2-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/07/make-no-little-plans.html
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Make no little plans 4, If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try again
Land use
Their plans for land use were as subject to change as all
the others.
In general, they believed that residential uses should be
separated from any other. Industrial uses should be consolidated and separated
from dwellings by a buffer zone.
Business use would be better served by the new shopping
centers. Mixed uses (commercial with apts) were wasteful. They created low rent
apartments and only fed what they felt was an over supply of commercial space.
The 1947 zoning map shows what was allowed at the start.
The ’42 Master plan shows what they wanted for residential
uses.
Over all, they reduced the size of the residential
buildings, but planned to make up for it by increasing the amount of land
available, by reducing commercial and industrial uses and through more
efficient distribution of the land.
But they wanted to lessen crowding and intended to build an
area for a population density of about 30-35,000 people per sq mile (a
reduction from our 1940 density of 43,000).
The ’48 comprehensive plan is more specific. It has defined
the shopping areas, new parks, and buffer zones, but is has increased the land
for industry at the cost of high density residential along Milwaukee.
In 1957 they completed drafting a new zoning ordinance and completely
re-drew the map.
You can see some of their intentions. They preemptively downzoned
the area for the park between Oakley and
Leavitt. They removed most of the commercial property on Damen south of North,
and pretty much matched the Comprehensive Plan’s industrial lay out with a
little extra added in down by the Felt & Tarrant Adding Machine plant.
The notion of wide scale land clearance and redistribution had
become less realistic after the Urban Community Conservation Act of 1953 and
their plans gradually got smaller.
I apologize for my efforts on the current zoning map.
Decades of spot zoning have left it looking like a painter’s drop cloth. There
are so many, that I gave up East of Ashland.
Paul K. Dickman
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/09/make-no-small-plans-5-we-dont-want.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-3-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-2-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/07/make-no-little-plans.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-3-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/08/make-no-little-plans-2-if-at-first-you.html
http://wickerblather.blogspot.com/2015/07/make-no-little-plans.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















